This law is neither a recommendation nor a best practice: it is a legal obligation for all private-sector companies, regardless of their size. Companies that fail to comply are subject to fines from the Labor Directorate, lawsuits, and significant reputational damage.
For organizations that need specialized guidance on implementing protocols and complying with the Karin Law, Wiseplan offers comprehensive human resources consulting services with expertise in Chilean labor regulations.
The law eliminates the requirement of repetition to establish workplace harassment. Previously, the harassing conduct had to be repeated; now, a single serious act can constitute workplace harassment if it affects the employee’s dignity, creates an intimidating environment, or harms the employee’s employment status or job opportunities.
For the first time in Chilean law, the concept of “workplace violence perpetrated by third parties outside the employment relationship” is incorporated. This includes assaults by customers, suppliers, users of public services, or other external individuals. Employers must also implement preventive measures for these types of situations.
Prevention protocols and investigation procedures must incorporate a gender perspective. This means recognizing that certain forms of harassment disproportionately affect women and that investigation procedures must take gender power dynamics into account when analyzing the facts.
Every company must develop and implement a prevention protocol that includes, at a minimum:
The company's internal regulations must include an investigation procedure that meets the following requirements:
| Stage | Deadline | Person in Charge | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Receipt of a Complaint | Immediate | Employer or Designated Representative | Formal written acknowledgment of the employee's complaint |
| Safeguard Measures | Immediate | Employer | Social distancing, rescheduling of work hours, psychological support |
| Start of the investigation | 3 business days | Employer or Labor Inspectorate | Appoint an investigator or refer the matter to the Labor Inspectorate |
| Internal Investigation | 30 business days | Research Fellow | Gathering of evidence, interviews, impartial analysis |
| Submission of Conclusions | 2 days after closing | Researcher | Submit a report to the Labor Inspectorate |
| DT Statement | 30 business days | Labor Inspection | Comments on the Research Report |
| Imposition of Sanctions | 15 days after the ruling | Employer | Warning, fine, dismissal, or other measures |
The company must ensure that employees have access to an accessible, confidential, and secure reporting channel. This channel may be internal (managed by the company or a contracted third party) or external (direct reporting to the Labor Inspectorate). Employees have the right to choose either option.
All employees must receive training on the contents of the prevention protocol, reporting and investigation procedures, behaviors that constitute workplace harassment, sexual harassment, and workplace violence, and the consequences of engaging in such behaviors.
The RIOHS must be updated to incorporate the provisions of the Karin Act. Companies that do not have a RIOHS (companies with fewer than 10 employees) must also implement the prevention protocol and the investigation procedure.
The law and administrative case law identify various types of conduct that may constitute workplace harassment:
Failure to comply with the obligations established by the Karin Act may result in the following consequences for the company:
Conduct a psychosocial risk assessment within the organization. Identify the areas, positions, or workplace dynamics with the highest risk of harassment or violence. Review the current status of your internal regulations, existing protocols, and reporting mechanisms.
Develop a prevention protocol that includes all the elements required by law. Design an investigation procedure with clear deadlines, designated responsible parties, and decision-making processes. Define the reporting channel and confidentiality mechanisms.
Incorporate the prevention protocol and investigation procedure into the Internal Regulations on Order, Health, and Safety. File the amendments with the appropriate Labor Inspection Office.
Train all employees on the contents of the protocol, the reporting procedures, and prohibited conduct. Conduct specific training sessions for supervisors and those responsible for investigating complaints.
Implement a monitoring system that allows for periodic evaluation of the protocol's effectiveness, tracking of workplace climate indicators, and the detection of early warning signs of risky situations.
Companies that seek to be leaders in harassment prevention go beyond minimum compliance:
Yes. The Karin Act applies to all private-sector companies, regardless of their size. Companies with fewer than 10 employees—which are not required to have internal regulations—must nevertheless implement the prevention protocol and the investigation procedure.
Yes. The employee has the right to file a complaint either with the employer or directly with the Labor Inspectorate. It is not necessary to exhaust internal remedies before filing a complaint with the Labor Inspectorate. The choice of channel is entirely up to the employee filing the complaint.
The Karin Act does not distinguish based on the harasser’s position in the hierarchy. If the employer or legal representative is the accused, the investigation must be conducted by the Labor Inspectorate, since it would not be impartial for the company to investigate its own owner or CEO.
Yes. Workplace harassment proven through an investigation that complies with due process constitutes grounds for termination without entitlement to severance pay (grounds under Article 160, No. 1, subparagraph f of the Labor Code). However, the termination must be supported by a thorough investigation to prevent it from being deemed unjustified.
Yes. The protections under the Karin Act apply to all forms of work, including telecommuting and remote work. Workplace harassment can also occur through digital means (email, messaging, video calls), and the law expressly addresses this.
The Karin Act is not just a legal obligation: it is an opportunity to build safer, more respectful, and more productive work environments. Companies that implement its protocols rigorously and in good faith not only avoid penalties but also strengthen their organizational culture and employer brand.
If your company needs guidance on properly implementing the protocols of the Karin Law, updating its internal policies, or training its teams, contact Wiseplan. We have professionals specializing in labor law and human resources consulting to support your organization throughout this process.
Introduction and Why It Matters in Chile...
Introduction and Context in Chile 2026 “`html...
What does a human resources consulting firm do, and why do Chilean companies need one? A...
What is payroll outsourcing, and how does it work in Chile? Payroll outsourcing in Chile is...
Human Resources Management in Chile: A New Paradigm Human resources management in Chile is undergoing...
What is the Karin Act, and why does it affect all companies in Chile? The...