The employer is liable to the workers and the authorities, because the obligations to pay wages and make contributions rest with the employer; the employer may then seek compensation from the supplier for damages in accordance with the contract and general rules.
The distinction can be summarized as follows:
That is why a supplier's error does not relieve the company of the problem with its employees. What changes is whether it will be able to recover the cost, and that depends largely on what was agreed upon before the incident.
The status of employer is not transferred: the company remains responsible for the full payment of wages, the payment of social security contributions, the withholding of taxes, the maintenance of payroll records, and the safekeeping of employee data.
Here are the guidelines you should keep in mind:
If you want to review all of these obligations as part of a preventive program, this labor compliance guide can serve as a starting point.
Law 20.123 regulates subcontracting and temporary staffing agencies; therefore, it does not make the payroll provider the employer of your workers nor does it transfer your obligations to the payroll provider.
This confusion is common because in Chile the term “outsourcing” is used to refer to very different situations. Under the Labor Code’s definition of subcontracting, the principal company may be liable for the labor and social security obligations that a contractor owes to its own workers. The logic is almost the opposite of what is at issue here:
| Situation | Who is an employer? | Which question does it answer? |
|---|---|---|
| Employees at your company whose salaries are calculated by a vendor | Your company | Who is responsible if your salary is calculated incorrectly? Your company, without prejudice to filing a claim against the vendor |
| Analysts from the service provider | The supplier | Could your company fulfill its labor obligations? It is necessary to determine whether the service falls under the subcontracting regime. |
The subcontracting regime imposes requirements that must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis and does not apply to intermittent or sporadic work or services. Since monthly payroll services are typically ongoing, it is reasonable to seek advice on their application and to consider requesting certificates of compliance with labor and social security regulations—such as Form F30-1 issued by the Labor Directorate—which help ensure the exercise of rights to information and withholding.
It depends on the source and the contract: the company first resolves the issue with the employee or the relevant authority, and then the cost is allocated based on who caused the error and what was agreed upon.
| Error | To whom is the company accountable? | What to regularize | What to Check to Recover the Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Underpayment of an Employee | Employee, and eventually the Labor Inspectorate or the courts | Difference, including any adjustments and applicable interest | If the difference itself was compensation owed, it is normally an expense; the claim pertains to the surcharges and the work involved in correcting the error |
| Overpayment | Worker | Arrange for a refund with the help of an advisor, because discounts are limited | Amounts that could not be recovered and the cause of the error |
| Incorrectly reported or overdue contributions | Social Security Agencies and Workers | Filing and payment, including any applicable adjustments, interest, and penalties | Whether the delay was due to the supplier or to a lack of funds or approval from the company |
| Erroneous Withholding of Single Tax | SII and Employee | Correction and Reconciliation with the Employee | Reason for the error and surcharges paid |
| Miscalculated Severance Pay | Employee or court | It depends on the status of the settlement; it requires legal review | Submitted Calculation, Approval, and Data Used |
| Leakage of salary or health data | Affected workers and the competent authority | Containment, assessment, and relevant communications | Security Provisions, Incident Notification, and Measures Taken |
Look at the first row. If an employee was supposed to receive a higher amount, the company was always responsible for paying that difference: the supplier should not reimburse the salary itself, but rather the additional loss it caused. Separating these two amounts prevents unproductive arguments.
These are the most sensitive cases because they result in additional charges, affect the employee’s social security benefits, and can prevent a termination from taking effect until the amount owed is paid.
Article 162 of the Labor Code, as amended by the so-called Bustos Law, establishes that if contributions have not been paid at the time of termination, the termination does not take effect until the contributions are brought up to date. Therefore, a long-standing error that went unnoticed can turn a routine termination into a much more serious issue. Contributions are paid the following month within the legal deadlines: generally by the 10th, or by the 13th if the process is electronic, with any applicable extensions. Check the applicable calendar and allow for a buffer to address any issues.
It is also important to identify the root of the problem. If the supplier prepared the form correctly and the company did not approve the payment or did not disburse the funds on time, the responsibility lies with the company. And if the supplier received the funds but did not make the payment, that is a different situation and must be reviewed urgently with legal assistance. To review how the system works in general, see this guide on social security contributions.
You may demand that the error be corrected and, in the event of noncompliance, claim any damages you can prove, within the limits of the contract and the general rules of civil law.
To determine this, an attorney will typically review four factors: what the supplier was obligated to do, who was responsible for the incorrect information, whether the company approved the result, and what the demonstrable damage is. If the contract includes a liability limit—for example, one tied to the fee—that limit may be decisive. Its validity and scope also depend on the specific case, particularly in the event of serious breaches.
The approval of the preliminary payroll deserves attention. Vendors often request it as a closing requirement, which is reasonable, but the contract should clarify what “approval” entails. A company may validate totals and changes without necessarily reviewing the technical implementation of every formula that the vendor agreed to perform.
It is advisable to negotiate the definition of an error, the deadlines for notification and correction, surcharges to be paid by the supplier, limits of liability, insurance, data protection, and the handling of funds.
First, contain the problem and preserve the evidence; then quantify it, correct it, inform those affected, and assign responsibility—in that order.
Avoid unilateral deductions to recover an overpayment. The Labor Code limits what can be deducted from pay, so it’s best to agree on the refund and review the formula before implementing it. It also helps to have a firm grasp of the document in question: this guide to pay stubs breaks down its components.
The lawsuit is typically filed against the employer, so it will be the company that must defend itself using its records, without prejudice to the supplier providing supporting documentation or being held liable at a later date.
Persistent pay disparities can lead to complaints filed with the Labor Inspectorate or legal actions. In serious cases, an employee may invoke constructive dismissal or voluntary resignation, as regulated by the Labor Code. In general, labor rights expire two years after they become enforceable, and claims arising from acts and contracts expire six months after the termination of employment. This explains why documentation must remain available even after changing providers.
In the event of a real emergency, it is advisable to seek advice early on. Wiseplan has attorneys who specialize in labor law to represent companies in legal disputes, and this article on labor law defense for companies explains this process in greater detail.
You can explain what happened transparently, but that doesn't change who is responsible for resolving the issue: your employer. The most helpful thing to do is to tell them when the issue will be corrected, how the adjustment will appear on their pay stub, and who they should contact with any questions.
The fine is imposed on the employer who was penalized. However, if the contract or general rules allow you to recover that cost from the supplier—provided the violation was due to the supplier’s failure to comply—that is a separate matter. Review the facts of the case, the evidence, and the agreed-upon limits.
Approval does not necessarily absolve the supplier of liability, but it can complicate the claim. It will depend on what the contract defines as approval, whether the error was detectable during that review, and who provided the data.
It is not advisable to set a single deadline without reviewing each type of document, because there are different labor, social security, and tax implications. Develop a policy with professional guidance, and make sure the contract with the provider allows you to retrieve the information at any time.
The employer continues to have a duty of confidentiality toward its employees, and the service provider is liable for the information it undertook to protect. The specific liability depends on the facts, the contract, and the applicable personal data regulations.
Not necessarily. Read about what risks it covers, who the insured party is, what exclusions apply, and the coverage amount. Insurance can provide financial backing to pay compensation, but it does not replace monthly checkups or your obligations as an employer.
If you'd like to review your current contract or set up a service with clearly defined responsibilities, you can contact Wiseplan and discuss your situation with their team.
According to this analysis of public information, Goodwork,...
Few data breaches are as damaging to an organization...
A miscalculated settlement, a premium paid...
According to this analysis of publicly available information, Wiseplan, Headhunters Chile, and GM InSite received the highest scores...
What does it mean to outsource payroll processing in Chile? Outsourcing payroll processing in Chile...
What is headhunting, and how does it work in Chile? Headhunting in Chile is...
What is a headhunting firm, and how does it work? A headhunting firm is...